APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 24 PARAGRAPH 3 OF PERMA NUMBER 7 OF 2022 CONCERNING REMOTE EXAMINATION OF WITNESSES THROUGH AUDIO VISUAL COMMUNICATION MEDIA (CASE STUDY OF TANJUNG PATI CLASS IB RELIGIOUS COURT)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31958/jisrah.v5i1.12136Keywords:
Witnesses, Evidence, Audio-visual communication mediaAbstract
This research aims to explain the procedures for carrying out witness examinations remotely via audio-visual communication media based on the Decree of the Director General of Badilag Number 1465 / DJA / HK.05 / SK / IX / 2023 at the Tanjung Pati Class IB Religious Court, as well as explaining the views of the Judge and Registrar Substitute related to the implementation of remote witness examinations via audio-visual communication media at the Tanjung Pati Class IB Religious Court. The results of this research found that the trial judge was of the view that the examination of witnesses remotely could be carried out by considering and observing the presence of the existing witnesses. The purpose of carrying out the examination of witnesses remotely was to apply the principles of simple, fast and low-cost justice, as stated by the substitute registrar present at the hearing. Then the Substitute Judge and Registrar also expressed the view that there were obstacles during its implementation, namely a long administrative process and network problems which could disrupt the implementation of remote witness examinations via audio-visual communication media. Based on the research findings, this study confirms that remote examination of witnesses via audio-visual communication media can actually be carried out by observing the condition of the witnesses' presence.References
Amin, R. (2020). Hukum Pembuktian dalam Perkara Pidana dan Perdata. Deepublish.
Cornelia, I. (2019). Analisis Yuridis Kekuatan Alat Bukti Saksi Testimonium De Auditu Dalam Sidang Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Madiun. Al-Syakhsiyyah: Journal of Law & Family Studies, 1(1).
Gunawan, R. (2021). PENGGUNAAN VIDEO CONFERENCE PADA PEMERIKSAAN DI SIDANG PENGADILAN DALAM MASA PANDEMI COVID 19 (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Negeri Makassar). Universitas Hasanuddin.
Juanda, R., & Seprasia, R. (2021). PELAKSANAAN PEMERIKSAAN SAKSI JARAK JAUH DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN VIDIO TELECONFERENCE PADA PERSIDANGAN PERKARA PIDANA DI PENGADILAN NEGERI KELAS IA PADANG. Abstract of Undergraduate Research, Faculty of Law, Bung Hatta University, 12(2), 4.
Pandiangan, H. J. (2017). Perbedaan hukum pembuktian dalam perspektif hukum acara pidana dan perdata. To-Ra, 3(2), 565–582.
Rasyid, L. M. (2015). Modul Pengantar Hukum Acara Perdata. Aceh: Unimalpress.
Sholikah, M. (2022). Implementasi Penyelesaian Perkara Berbasis E-court dan E-litigasi Menurut PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Agama Malang).
Susilo, W. (2015). Penggunaan Alat Bukti Kesaksian “De Auditu” Dalam Membuktikan Kebenaran Sengketa Perdata. IUS: Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum, 3(1), 51–68.
Tsamrotul Fuadah, A. (2019). Hukum acara peradilan agama plus prinsip hukum acara Islam dalam risalah Qadha Umar Bin Khattab. PT RAJAGRAFINDO PERSADA.
Ula, A. S. (2021). Efektivitas penerapan persidangan secara elektronik: Studi di Pengadilan Agama Cirebon. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim.
Cornelia, I. (2019). Analisis Yuridis Kekuatan Alat Bukti Saksi Testimonium De Auditu Dalam Sidang Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Madiun. Al-Syakhsiyyah: Journal of Law & Family Studies, 1(1).
Gunawan, R. (2021). PENGGUNAAN VIDEO CONFERENCE PADA PEMERIKSAAN DI SIDANG PENGADILAN DALAM MASA PANDEMI COVID 19 (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Negeri Makassar). Universitas Hasanuddin.
Juanda, R., & Seprasia, R. (2021). PELAKSANAAN PEMERIKSAAN SAKSI JARAK JAUH DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN VIDIO TELECONFERENCE PADA PERSIDANGAN PERKARA PIDANA DI PENGADILAN NEGERI KELAS IA PADANG. Abstract of Undergraduate Research, Faculty of Law, Bung Hatta University, 12(2), 4.
Pandiangan, H. J. (2017). Perbedaan hukum pembuktian dalam perspektif hukum acara pidana dan perdata. To-Ra, 3(2), 565–582.
Rasyid, L. M. (2015). Modul Pengantar Hukum Acara Perdata. Aceh: Unimalpress.
Sholikah, M. (2022). Implementasi Penyelesaian Perkara Berbasis E-court dan E-litigasi Menurut PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Agama Malang).
Susilo, W. (2015). Penggunaan Alat Bukti Kesaksian “De Auditu” Dalam Membuktikan Kebenaran Sengketa Perdata. IUS: Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum, 3(1), 51–68.
Tsamrotul Fuadah, A. (2019). Hukum acara peradilan agama plus prinsip hukum acara Islam dalam risalah Qadha Umar Bin Khattab. PT RAJAGRAFINDO PERSADA.
Ula, A. S. (2021). Efektivitas penerapan persidangan secara elektronik: Studi di Pengadilan Agama Cirebon. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim.
Downloads
Published
2024-05-01
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nur Aisyah, Hidayati Fitri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a?áCreative Commons Attribution License?áthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See?áThe Effect of Open Access).
